IDHAR UDHAR KI BAAT 75- CHALTA HAI Brig PS Gothra(Retd)
"Sir, are you from the Army?" a teenage girl asked, her eyes wide with curiosity after witnessing the change of guard ceremony at the War Memorial.
"Yes," I replied, mildly surprised. "But how did you know? I’m not wearing anything that screams 'ex-serviceman.'"
She smiled knowingly. "It’s the way you stood—upright and proud. Anyone could tell you're a Fauji."
Her words warmed my heart. Praise is rare after retirement, and for a moment, I basked in it. But my moment of pride was cut short when she followed up with, “Why were the Navy and Army soldiers standing together for a while?”
“Oh, that was for the handing and taking over of guard duties,” I explained.
“But they barely spoke to each other! All I heard were some loud, clipped commands. It didn’t look like much of a handover,” she said, her tone skeptical.
I chuckled. “Ah, that’s the ceremonial part. The actual handover happens beforehand. What you saw is more about tradition than communication.”
She seemed unconvinced, and I could sense another barrage of questions coming. Before she could grill me further, I quickly excused myself. “Someone’s waiting for me in the car,” I said, making a hasty retreat.
As soon as I got into the car, my friend gave me a knowing look. “What’s wrong? You look rattled.”
I sighed. “I’m having one of those moments of deep regret—thinking about all the times I let my chalta hai attitude win during my service.”
“What brought this on?”
I explained, “Back when I was a young officer, I realized how pointless some ceremonial drills were during guard handovers. I even raised it with the Adjutant, but he shut me down. I swore I’d fix it when I became a Commanding Officer (CO). But when I finally got there, I’d become so comfortable with the system that I did nothing.”
“That’s it? You’re upset about some drills?” he said dismissively.
“No, there’s more,” I said. “For instance, I spent countless hours mastering how to fix weapon malfunctions in training. But during actual encounter, when the size-se-mota round got stuck in my carbine, I couldn’t fix it. I was so frustrated that I vowed to write to my seniors about the carbine’s shortcomings. But I never did. That weapon stayed in service for two more decades, wasting time and risking lives.”
“Maybe your seniors wouldn’t have taken it well.”
“That’s the problem—we always expect someone else to bell the cat,” I said, my frustration growing. “Then there’s the mess bhojan prastut drill. A Havildar once told me he didn’t want to take up the job of mess in-charge because his kids studied in the same school as the officers’ kids. He worried they’d be teased for seeing him salute or announce Sriman Bhojan Tyar Hai in the mess. I thought, why not replace the drill with a simple buzzer or light? But when I became CO, I left it untouched. Same with buglers standing precariously on rooftops to announce a VIP’s arrival. In this era of sound systems, why are we still doing that? And don’t get me started on pipers parading around the dining table during dinner nights—it’s colonial nostalgia at its worst.”
“Hmm,” my friend said, but I wasn’t done.
“Unit bands, too. Why not centralize them at Tri services level? Record the tunes once and let soldiers focus on real soldierly skills. Watching soldiers play at weddings and private functions is disheartening. Today’s battlefield is full of sensors and tech; marching tunes don’t win wars anymore.”
My friend nodded thoughtfully. “But as CO, you had a lot on your plate. You couldn’t fix everything.”
“That’s just an excuse,” I admitted. “The truth is, I was scared to rock the boat. I didn’t even destroy the outdated documents, always thinking, What if we need them later? Even after automation, I kept physical registers running alongside digital ones. Didn't have the courage to discontinue the book inspections. Instead of streamlining and reducing the clerical work, I just added extra clerks from GD soldiers. It was pure jo chalta hai, chalne do.”
My friend let out a heavy sigh. “God help you,” he said, signalling the driver to stop the car. “I have some work here. I’ll meet you tomorrow.”
As I sat in the car alone, I reflected on my inaction. My chalta hai attitude had betrayed the ambitious young officer I once was—the one who wanted to challenge the system and make life easier for his subordinates. It’s easy to dismiss regrets as hindsight wisdom, but isn’t it criminal not to learn from them? If I’d acted on even half my ideas, maybe today’s soldiers would have more time for their families, more time to train, and fewer unnecessary burdens.
But I didn’t. And now, all I can do is hope the next generation doesn’t repeat my mistakes.
Note:- Criticism or new ideas most welcome as part comments. Don't get into Mainu Ki.
Someone is belling the cat now. The beating retreat drill has changed. Indian Navy flag and mess dress has changed , the iconic picture of 1971 in COAS office . That is at higher level. I always used to hate late night parties as young officer. I decided whenever I become CO I will change everything and I did windup before 10 PM much against the wishes of senior officers. But few drills are essential like Quarter Guard drills etc.
ReplyDeleteVery true. Most of us have continued with this attitude in our service. While some traditions/drills are essential, some can be done away with. Unfortunately this is where opinions differ as to what can be done away with. Play safe way such as manual as well as automated account keeping is one such play safe. However things are changing and the next generation is smarter in some ways and yet more 'chalta hai' in others! This is life
ReplyDeleteBeautifully Articulated Sir - Unfortunately nothing will change or will take decades - If we stop the Buddy system We may have a 1857 type revolt once again - On the lighter side - . Nevertheless- ‘ Change is the only Constant’ ๐ซก
ReplyDeleteYes ,there is lot to be changed, HRD -mostly it is destruction of Human resources not developing. But change has to be permanent not temporary with changing with hierarchy. Very nice write up every small change will matter but mostly we spend years in deciding shape and shades of changing uniform, it took us decades to induct half sleeve shirt from full sleeve permanently rolled up,just imagine in a civil environment a shirt sleev rolled up like we used to in uniform or even stiching shirt and trousers of same cloth.
ReplyDeleteSpot on. Very often many join the service with stars in their eyes but get caught up with the system, then continue with this attitude in our service & become part of the system. I was never happy with any OR having to travel without rail reservations & being uncertain about his leave. So as a Comdg Officer this is one thing that I ensured- every one knew well in advance when he was to go on leave and he travelled with rail reservations. The leave dates didn’t change even on account of any event ( Adm Inspection etc)- which incidentally I was strongly advised against doing so! But things worked out well. However change is inevitable & things are changing .While certain traditions/drills are essential, some can be toned down/ modified .
ReplyDeleteChange is the only constant. Adapt, adjust or perish.
ReplyDelete"The only thing more difficult than introducing a new idea in the military is to get the old one out", the statement sums it all. However having said that, there are innumerable such traditions which are senseless but they do contribute in making us a unique organisation performing unique tasks/missions. Maybe there is some method in the madness.
ReplyDeleteCheerz.
Chane vs tradition. Battle will continue. Review after 10 years a must
ReplyDeleteSo true sir.
ReplyDeleteWhen one thinks back of time spent in service, one can relate to so many instances when we as rebellious youngsters wanted to question many traditions which seemed of no use, much to the dismay of our seniors. But when we became senior enough we were similarly dismayed when our youngsters did not observe traditions which we felt were sacred. I guess change is constant and we should have the courage to change anything which does not affect discipline and efficiency of the unit to adapt to evolving times and technology.
True Indeed
ReplyDeleteAn apt topic for discussion......need to rectify frivolous practices is a necessity....however, the bigger issue remains as regards organisation's, and equipping....With a tenure of two to three years, issue is what to fight for and what not to fight for....one can not fight the organization unless you are in a position where your decisions matter...then comes issue of continuity, next incumbent may undo or revise what you have promulgated....so the best via media is follow the value system and change what does not align with the value system...do what is feasible and aligns with the best practices...change is constant but don't change for shake of change
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteVery well articulated.
The times are changing with the new generation but still drills happen on the names of tradition and the feeling of being something different.
It has been ingrained as a way of military life. Same happens with everyone and that was the reason the author himself was not able to change as it didn't strike him that hard to change at a later stage.
May be similar situations didnt happen during the tenure of a CO. The regular routine could have been more important or challenging to take out the focus.
The issue resonates when again been brought out post retirement and the grey cells getting down the memory lane.
The civilian population is thrilled to witness the immaculate and precision drills. However the issues of operational intent should have been brought up. But was the weapon still in use in his command is a question of missed sight. The intent to bring a change is very clear and deserves acknowledgement. The new generation weapons are being inducted. But the precarious situation poor man management still need to be addressed. Yes the colonial drills of subduance need to be changed. Little steps one by one.
True! Challan do attitude! I too could never relate to certain traditional practices, but as a junior you were told to shut up and not think. As CO or Bde Cdr, tried to change a lot of things despite opposition and status quoism. But the n xt chap went back to the same old traditions, drills and practices. Sannu ki!
ReplyDeleteBeautiful read sir..... I think it articulates exactly, what all of us think, but are never able to find the time/ mental space to properly address. Regards
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately chalta hai attitude has entered armed forces due to steep promotion policy and ambitions to rise quickly. Once you are superseded you are look down by others even if you are top gun. We need to change this to save our ethos of forces. Excellent article sir like always
ReplyDeleteThe narration couldn't be more apt. All of us wanted to change certain ceremonies while in service but majority of us couldn't. Change is welcome if initiated by the concerned service headquarters. The political interference is undesirable. Few instances have happened in the recent past.
ReplyDeleteChange is the only constant - this is amply reflected in the latest ad of Birla Opus Paints - as regards armed forces is concerned we should constantly evolve tactically, technologically & administratively with the aim of keeping pace with the current developments - our social evolution should focus on cementing the core principles of discipline & trust which are absolutely essential for achieving our collective goal - be it war or peace !!!!
ReplyDeleteWell said. Our military mindset enables us to follow set patterns and not develop a critical thinking mindset. As an org there should be open discussions about our traditional drills to discard or fine tune them to changed times.
ReplyDeleteNice post. Enjoyed reading. You can't change the country nor the org alone however where ever u are at the helm please change that will benefit us /org. But dont expect it to continue it may be reversed once u relinquish by the person who occupies the chair now. Jai Ho
ReplyDeleteNeed a lot of courage for confession, at least you have that.
ReplyDeleteBrigadier Gothra’s reflections are both poignant and thought-provoking. They underscore the delicate balance between preserving traditions that foster identity and discipline while shedding those that no longer serve a meaningful purpose. The anecdotes provide a powerful reminder of how critical it is for leaders to take ownership of change during their tenure. The "chalta hai" mindset is indeed an enemy of progress, and your words remind us all that leadership requires the courage to challenge norms.
ReplyDeleteTo all readers, it is worth considering: What traditions, in your experience, hinder operational efficiency? How can we collectively foster a culture where innovation thrives without undermining the discipline that defines the armed forces?
Interesting topic but I do not agree with many points in this.
ReplyDeleteTraditional profession like military need to have many apparently useless drills and processes.
The profession which needs supreme sacrifice (in line of duty) can not be liberal in its thinking. The very word ‘drill’ itself means a thing to be done as inbuilt habit rather than thought-off activity. And that is necessary in the face of death. And ceremonial dress is another thing to attract people towards this dangerous profession.
Thus, drills and ceremonials are necessary evils. I do agree with points pertaining to mess etc, particularly in the backdrop of changed milieu. The drills in mess and socials settings can be looked into.
Also, the matter of standardisations where officers and troops come from varied areas, backgrounds and social customs.
Well selected topic and did a good justice to the subject, in an interesting manner. I feel that we should listen to the gen next and decide about what is needed now and in future; past is only to draw some useful lessons and act..
ReplyDeleteWe all do our bid in improving the work ethos & environment, in our own capacities. So, a change is always happening, with or without our realisation.
Warm regards
True.
ReplyDeleteOne has always tried to improve atleast in own Area of Influence. It has worked. The feedback further encouraged to add little more. Resistance to change will always be there, one has to give time to see the results.
Fact that this article generated so much of discussion,it indeed touched each one of us to the core. I have always felt our organization is personality,hierarchical oriented. Every time we have a change of Command in any formation or unit, the entire organization under the Commander tries to adopt to his thinking, values,& tastes. A big Army like ours with many years of history & operational experience should be above individuals & personalities & have time tested values,traditions ,standardized thinking & way to do things. While spit,polish & cleanliness is good, we need to curb on unnecessary protocol, needless pomp & show & focus more on far reaching technological changes in equipment & tactics coming world over.
ReplyDeleteSo true Dear PS, You are not alone in this hindsight awakening. But I am sure what you or all of us did was the part of foolproof transitory phase, where duplicacy and resistance to change afforded enough time for a unique evolutionary system duly supported by technology to emerge. The so called duplicacy has now been taken over by the cloud and storage devices. Great reflection.....keep it up.
ReplyDeleteNicely penned sir,
ReplyDeleteMany have written what is there in every other's mind after all we have gone through similar processes. I think it is the 'zero error syndrome' that killed the instinct to bring change. We all know the story of BiRa and reaction of both serving and retired. Many a times 'Siting of LMG' syndrome has also played a spoil sport. Just relate it and think about it from a Sec Cdr to perhaps theater Cdr. ๐
If wishes could change, determination does. As we wish to change the system when we reach the point of decision making our sustenance is taken over by the system. Perseverance can do miracles. Mind you sir, have no regret you can still make a difference.
ReplyDeleteNice post.
ReplyDeleteSome un nessacry customs including a few drills always face opposition in name of traditions. While few of them makes us stand apart from the civil crowd and also earn their respect/ awo, others should be changed to the practical side ( eg todays rationalised uniform).
ReplyDeleteLike in the first term at NDA, during ragda, all of us must have cursed and vowed that they, when senior, would not play with the dignity, like Front Roll from Sudan Block to the mess in full public glare. But we did the same in the nake of ' making the juniors tough'๐
Tipu, this is not the platform to suggest organgisational changes in Indian Army. Pure and Simple. In IA one doesn't want to be gama for no reason because that affects your mental peace , distracts from the job you are assigned in that particular posting and appt. We have lots of liabilities back home and we don't want to screw up our promotion from which we are judged in our families and our village folks. So Tipu what we do in our Army life with eyes closed like a pigeon has many reasons. It's good that you did and still doing with full chivalry.
ReplyDeleteVery well penned Sir. Unnecessary customs should be done away with. ๐
ReplyDeleteWith each year of Service accumulated, One starts loosing Ribs. "Man and the Organisation" by Desmond Morris, is a Book related to this interesting and so well written, Blog.
DeleteVery well articulated and most relevant in today's scenario where our Political Masters are driving a lot of changes in our erstwhile practices . The Military is a very big org and it is transformative and evolutionary so it will always adjust also nothing is cast in stone , remember- Back to Basics
ReplyDeleteI think Chalta hai attitude was used to justify one's lack of courage to make changes and ensure it works better and efficient. Why put in all the effort when i can justify doing nothing in a better way!!! The hierarchy also fooled the same attitude
ReplyDeleteVery well written, Brig Gothra…
ReplyDeleteWhen young, most vow to change the system, but obligatorily maintain status quo.....as you rightly said..... "Jo chalta hai, chalne do".
…….an involuntary attitude to hang on to traditional practices classifying it as a short sacred practice๐